<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Is The City Of Burien About To Increase Property Taxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.b-townblog.com/2009/11/02/letter-to-the-editor-is-the-city-of-burien-about-to-increase-property-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.b-townblog.com/2009/11/02/letter-to-the-editor-is-the-city-of-burien-about-to-increase-property-taxes/</link>
	<description>Daily Burien News, Events, Entertainment, Music, Videos &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lamphear</title>
		<link>http://www.b-townblog.com/2009/11/02/letter-to-the-editor-is-the-city-of-burien-about-to-increase-property-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-18579</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lamphear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b-townblog.com/?p=12065#comment-18579</guid>
		<description>So, I&#039;ll try to recreate my lost comments.

It&#039;s unfortunate that both the Voters Pamphlet statements for and against Burien&#039;s resoundingly defeated $25 vehicle license fee were either misleading or wrong.  

Opposition statements were simply wrong: Burien&#039;s property tax ranks 19th in King County, not 2nd (out of 39 cities); the fire station bond was proposed by Fire District #2, not the city of Burien; and Burien has a balanced budget (deficit budgets are unlawful).  It would be nice if tax opponents would stick to the truth rather than wild fantasy.

Support statements were misleading: while Burien&#039;s property tax is not among the county&#039;s highest, Burien imposes a host of other taxes that change the picture -- a 6% tax on utilities (electicity, natural gas, telephone, cell phone, cable TV , internet), a franchise fee on garbage charges, a business tax on gross income (no deductions), a business license fee, a parking tax, a rental car tax, an admissions tax, and many more.  Neighboring cities impose none of these or lower taxes.  During my 8 years on the council, I voted for all of them.  So, the tax matter is not so cut and dried.

As to the 1% property tax increase being considered by the city council, that is the limit the city can impose WITHOUT a vote of the people -- a previous gift from Tim Eyman and the tax haters [council authority used to be 6%].  In the guise of the stealth Transportation Benefit District, the city council is also empowered to impose a $20 vehicle license fee WITHOUT voter approval.

The price of democracy is eternal vigilance and I urge every voter to pay attention -- get the facts and cut the fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ll try to recreate my lost comments.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that both the Voters Pamphlet statements for and against Burien&#8217;s resoundingly defeated $25 vehicle license fee were either misleading or wrong.  </p>
<p>Opposition statements were simply wrong: Burien&#8217;s property tax ranks 19th in King County, not 2nd (out of 39 cities); the fire station bond was proposed by Fire District #2, not the city of Burien; and Burien has a balanced budget (deficit budgets are unlawful).  It would be nice if tax opponents would stick to the truth rather than wild fantasy.</p>
<p>Support statements were misleading: while Burien&#8217;s property tax is not among the county&#8217;s highest, Burien imposes a host of other taxes that change the picture &#8212; a 6% tax on utilities (electicity, natural gas, telephone, cell phone, cable TV , internet), a franchise fee on garbage charges, a business tax on gross income (no deductions), a business license fee, a parking tax, a rental car tax, an admissions tax, and many more.  Neighboring cities impose none of these or lower taxes.  During my 8 years on the council, I voted for all of them.  So, the tax matter is not so cut and dried.</p>
<p>As to the 1% property tax increase being considered by the city council, that is the limit the city can impose WITHOUT a vote of the people &#8212; a previous gift from Tim Eyman and the tax haters [council authority used to be 6%].  In the guise of the stealth Transportation Benefit District, the city council is also empowered to impose a $20 vehicle license fee WITHOUT voter approval.</p>
<p>The price of democracy is eternal vigilance and I urge every voter to pay attention &#8212; get the facts and cut the fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lamphear</title>
		<link>http://www.b-townblog.com/2009/11/02/letter-to-the-editor-is-the-city-of-burien-about-to-increase-property-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-18578</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lamphear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b-townblog.com/?p=12065#comment-18578</guid>
		<description>Ooops -- finishing my comment after striking the wrong key!

The city council, sans disguise, can increase property taxes by 1% WITHOUT a vote of the people.

While the country and the city are in a deep recession, public needs and the costs of providing them generally do not go down.  Sales taxes from the auto dealers historically supported our quality public services -- no more.

I wholly support increasing property taxes by the 1% allowed by (a stupid) law.   But let&#039;s not rebuke the voters by imposing the $20 fee available to the council.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops &#8212; finishing my comment after striking the wrong key!</p>
<p>The city council, sans disguise, can increase property taxes by 1% WITHOUT a vote of the people.</p>
<p>While the country and the city are in a deep recession, public needs and the costs of providing them generally do not go down.  Sales taxes from the auto dealers historically supported our quality public services &#8212; no more.</p>
<p>I wholly support increasing property taxes by the 1% allowed by (a stupid) law.   But let&#8217;s not rebuke the voters by imposing the $20 fee available to the council.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 13/21 queries in 0.168 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 214/336 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.b-townblog.com @ 2012-02-12 18:35:17 -->
